Theo Schlossnagle wrote: > > Having mod_backhand use mod_proxy isn't very difficult. We implemented > that for a client. I don't understand the comment about the web server > doing stuff. mod_proxy sits inside apache and adheres to the same > limitations do to it architectural position as mod_backhand. >
Just that just because you *can* implement something in the web server, doesn't mean you *should* or *must*. A web server is part of one's web infrastructure, not its entirety. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."
