Graham Leggett wrote: > > William A. Rowe, Jr. said: > > > For a stable branch though - more often such changes should just > > be -vetoed- instead of worked-around. Packaging changes would > > seem to signal breakage, not a reason for a workaround. > > > -1 not CTR. Lazy consensus. Propose, give 3 - 5 days (what > > ever your schedule best provides) and then commit. If folks > > object they will speak up - if not - then you aren't hampered. > > Seems reasonable. > > +1. >
Agreed. But I was also +1 on the original. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."
