Re: Time for 2.0.53?

[Jess Holle]

Brad Nicholes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, January 31, 2005 2:26:09 PM >>> I'd love to see the LDAP socket timeout configuration stuff make it in for 2.0.53! -- Jess Holle justin Me too ;) Any voters out there? I've already cast my vote (Obviously) >From the looks of the STATUS file, there appears to be a number of backports with 3 +1's that just need to be backported. Brad I don't have a vote, but I believe the socket timeout configuration is necessary to address issues seen with firewall timeouts and the LDAP connections held open by Apache. -- Jess Holle