Stas Bekman wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 1:43 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any reason why we don't enable reporting of Req? I have a 2.1 patch ready to go, but I don't know why we don't do this....
I have no earthly idea what you are talking about. =)
Can you please provide some more details? -- justin
Already committed (love CTR). Basically, the 'Req' value displayed by mod_status is always 0 since we never update the required worker fields that note start and stop processing time.
Whoah! wait long enough and the work will be done by someone else :) I was just about to get this done :)
Jim, what would it take to backport it to 2.0? I see that 149550 changes ap_time_process_request API, but it's an internal API, no?
Piece o' cake. I'll add it to 2.0's STATUS. Yeah, the ap_time_process_request API changed (for the better, IMO, since the worker "info" should be opaque(sp?)), but it's just internal. At least, we don't declare it as public :)
thanks Jim. and 3 +1s were added already. if it makes into 2.0.53 that would be great.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
