> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 2:39 AM
> New Revision: 152973 [...] + /* RFC 2616 10.3.5 states that entity headers are not supposed + * to be in the 304 response. Therefore, we need to load in the + * cached headers before we update the cached headers. That's not how I read that section. 14.26 has some specific text stating cache-related header fields should be included. Sander