> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 2:39 AM

> New Revision: 152973

[...]
+        /* RFC 2616 10.3.5 states that entity headers are not supposed
+         * to be in the 304 response.  Therefore, we need to load in the
+         * cached headers before we update the cached headers.

That's not how I read that section.  14.26 has some specific text
stating cache-related header fields should be included.

Sander

Reply via email to