On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:39:06 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow :) That would be extraordinarily useful. Any hope the scheme > would be extensible, so a module such as cgi or rewrite could show > more specific Phases?
I'm leaning towards having completely accurate info maintained by the core, and arbitrary modules would need to use a separate mechanism to provide more info. I see enough implementation problems in non-core modules to be skeptical that such modules could be trusted to safely interoperate with core with the maintenance of a single indication of state.
