At 07:42 PM 3/16/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>For anyone who wants to argue that this is a PHP-caused anomaly, note also >>http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200501/apachemods.html > >-10% followed by +11% the following month: > >http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200502/apachemods.html > >Big swings like that are almost always artificial. One or two big domain >parkers switching versions or toggling the server header. You can't deduce >much from that.
Agreed. February reports that both 1.3.33 and 2.0.53 are proving sufficiently stable, ~90% push forward, ~10% fall back. Of course some users will encounter trouble and fall back to regroup. Some number less than 1 in 10 reassures me that the httpd project mostly is moving forward. I never look at the overall numbers, or number of adopters of any given module. Only looking for trends against the exact latest release we've shipped.
