On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 05:37:01PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > First, I'm -1 on moving 2.1.4 to -beta- until the conflicts > between apr-iconv 0.9 and 1.x are resolved. The apr team is > currently addressing this.
Would you be against re-rolling 2.1.4 with an updated apr-iconv that uses the APR_ICONV1_PATH environment variable instead and calling that 2.1.4 tarball beta? My understanding is that this change is done entirely within APR-iconv and does not have any direct effect on httpd. Therefore, the httpd code is identical and unchanged: only the dependency is updated. I'm reluctant to waste yet another release because a dependency has bugs that have nothing whatsoever to do with httpd. I also still feel that these are issues that would be safe to resolve during the beta process. -- justin
