On Apr 2, 2005 2:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 05:45 AM 4/2/2005, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >On Apr 1, 2005 2:17 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> At 09:16 AM 4/1/2005, Eric Covener wrote: > > > >> >Attempt at a patch using CriticalSection instead of _locking() is > >> >attached, but I am by no means a win32 person -- hopefully someone can > >> >take a look. > >> > >> However, it will break Windows 9x/ME so, for 1.3, we need at least > >> some detection to decide if we use this solution. > > > >I don't have a Win9x box any more to test, but doc says this > > > >Requirements > >Client Requires Windows XP, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows NT > >Workstation, Windows Me, Windows 98, or Windows 95. > >Server Requires Windows Server 2003, Windows 2000 Server, or Windows NT > >Server. > > Doh!!! TryEnterCriticalSection() is the NT specific API I was > thinking about. If this is a blocking EnterCriticalSection(), > there is no Win32 version issue.
yep; I'll add the patch to STATUS...
