On Fri, 13 May 2005, Sander Striker wrote: > Andrà Malo wrote: > > I'm seeing it like this: > > > > Once forked off, 2.1.x would be *stabilizing* branch, that finally leads > > to a 2.2.x branch, when we feel, it's stable (svn mv 2.1.x 2.2.x?). From the > > 2.1.x branch we tag alpha and beta releases; from *stable* 2.2.x rc and > > stable release. I think that's exactly the point of the odd/even system - > > 2.2.0 being a GA version. > > > > I see (now :-) that we should have already branched 2.1.x the first time we > > released a 2.1 version. > > +1.
Agreed. +1. It was way too confusing to have 2.0.35 be the first "real" 2.0 release. I do not wish to see us repeat that.
