--On Tuesday, June 7, 2005 11:42 PM +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, if this is a stupid quickshot, but what about something like:
Nope, it's not stupid as that's about the only sane place I can think of sticking it as well. The only catch is that if a handler exits this way, it probably means that r->status isn't correct either. So, perhaps we also set r->status explicitly in this additional code path. -- justin
