At 03:03 AM 6/24/2005, Paul Querna wrote: >Please vote on releasing 2.1.6 as -alpha.
Your subject would probably mislead some casual readers, Releases cannot be veto'ed. They need 3 +1's, more +1's than -1's for release (with some reasonable time for folks to vote, 2-3 days seems typical.) Patches -can- be vetoed, but on technical merit with specific justification. In any case, if this picked up Trawick's patch 193205, then I'll zip up a win32 source package and even tinker with rolling binaries. Will likely have to disable TLS, if it's enabled by default, for LDAP. Microsoft's SDK grows cruftier (it already was, somewhat) as ldap_start_tls comes into play. SVN trunk seems to behave correctly w.r.t. issues raised by Watchfire but I have a bit more testing of some other combinations. Bill
