Joe Orton wrote:
>
> An empty string, right: I think it's certainly correct to treat that as
> invalid C-L header;
>
While we wait on Roy's response, my own PoV is that we should
accept it and assume it means '0', so be as lenient and forgiving
as possible in input ("be generous in input, rigorous in output").
But if Roy says it's invalid, then we need to do what's right :)
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"Sith happens" - Yoda
