|
Is this just a code dump... or are the Covalent authors promising to
support it and help adapt it to ( Non-Covalent Apache ) needs?
There's already an awful lot of Covalent sponsored code in Apache 2.0
that was 'abandoned' by the original authors.
I believe any code submission to Apache requires at least some
clarification about "support".
Kevin Kiley
In a message dated 7/7/2005 2:49:51 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Jul 7, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Sander Striker wrote: |
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Paul Querna
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Proj... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project TOKILEY
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Paul A Houle
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Rich Bowen
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Paul Querna
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Brian Pane
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Mladen Turk
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Geoffrey Young
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Bill Stoddard
- Re: [VOTE] mod_ftp for HTTP Server Project Justin Erenkrantz
