On 7/14/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is the rollup of everything that we have collected > to address c-l/t-e conformance in the httpd-2.1 trunk, which > should apply clean to httpd-2.0 branch. I'll commit in 24 hrs > by lazy consensus, but would rather see a few +1's first.
What's the deal with "lazy concensus" here? If you don't have the reviews, you don't commit. > ... I totally agree with Jeff's plan, the only > way to address this is to backport the corrected 2.1 proxy > request handler. that design point is not something I can confirm or deny at this point; all I remember noting was that I couldn't test something successfully with 2.1 proxy
