Rian Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think this requires some more thought considering different > smtp connections and server requirements. The main drawback to > sub- requesting each rcpt to is that we have two different > handlers trying to read data from the socket. Is this problem > solved by spooling the data, and letting the two separate > requests read from the spool bucket?
Hmm, what would the smtp return status for DATA be, if only some of the RCPT_TO addresses are handled successfully? I've been assuming the http analog of "RCPT_TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" was "POST: /foo\nHost: bar" but I now think that's wrong from a resource identifier standpoint. -- Joe Schaefer
