On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:29:13PM -0000, William Rowe wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Sat Aug 6 14:29:05 2005 > New Revision: 230592 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=230592&view=rev > Log: > > As much as it pains me, seriously, it seems that reviewing the re-backport > of this code was too illegible for review, so it seems we will need to > re-review a fresh backport from httpd trunk.
That patch went through the normal 2.0.x review process and received three +1s and no vetoes. You absolutely cannot come along a few months later and say "oh, actually, -1" and rip stuff out that you now decide you don't like. You missed the chance to veto -- if you want to change the state of the 2.0.x tree now then you need to go through the review process like everyone else does. joe
