On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 10:44:11PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: > > We'd certainly sacrifice some speed under these circumstances; but it'd > > perhaps be better than nothing and would avoid the possibility where we > > serve > > content that is now excluded. -- justin > > IMO, this is why we should revive my original work[1] to enable > mod_cache to run as both a Quick Handler and a Normal Handler. We could > also invent a new handler, 'middle' handler, that runs after > map_to_storage, but before the rest of the hooks. (And hence, ran once > we have done directory blocks)
Is this is essentially the exact same problem as is being discussed in relation to r220307? ie a handler which wants per-dir information is running too early, and all they have available to them is the request_rec and the per-server config. If so, and it's a problem in two different places, that adds some merit to a general solution over hacking either module on an ad-hoc basis. -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
