"Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I agree with the idea... > > Kudos on the function name.
Oops, it doesn't follow our naming conventions tho, so I better change it to apreq_charset_divine. The other upshot to having a public function available, is that we no longer have to monkey around with charset info as an offset in the return value of apreq_decode(v). Instead, the caller can just run apreq_charset_divine on a decoded string to get the same information in a much cleaner way. -- Joe Schaefer
