On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:18:35PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:08:51PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:02:37PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > --On August 24, 2005 4:58:14 PM +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >This means that the listening sockets are freed for re-use. In the > > > >ordinary case, this makes no difference. However if for example admin > > > >changes "Listen 80" to "Listen 81" in the config, this rev makes port 80 > > > >immediately available (no waiting for the graceful children to die). > > > > > > Looks fine. However, this is probably worth a CHANGES entry. > > > > Especially since you win a free PR with this fix :) > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28167 > > It's not fixed *just* yet, only in prefork, and the PR reporter was > using worker. I had found the PR ;)
Duh, I missed that, sorry. > I'm testing worker now. Is fixing it in the non-experimental MPM's > enough to note it as fixed in the CHANGES file, or should I list the > MPM's? Having a CHANGES entry which explains the fix is limited to whatever set of MPMs sounds fine to me. joe
