On Friday 02 September 2005 08:12, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Before I point out that the current betas have all previously been
> vetoed on the 2.1 release chain - can anyone point me at the conclusion
> of the vote to split the httpd.conf into conf'lets?

Was there a vote?  ISTR discussing a muchly-stripped-down httpd.conf,
and a bunch of illustrative demo/examples, which is something I could
live with.  But adding gratuitous complexity to the default we ship would
be a -1 if that were really the proposal.


-- 
Nick Kew

Reply via email to