Mads Toftum wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:37:58PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
I agree about both of those. And I'd say the same even more strongly for
mod_dbd, simply because it (or whatever it becomes when updated in the
light of real-life experience) should become the basis of a new generation
of applications. If it's there, it'll start to permeate the Usual Suspects
like mod_perl. If not, we'll still have the old situation of Perl, Python,
PHP, Tcl, Authentication, Logging etc each maintaining its own separate
database connections, and having to reinvent the connection pooling
wheel if they want to if they want to improve scalability.
big +1 - let's not toss all the cool new features before the release and
get into the same situation as 1.3 -> 2.0 having trouble convincing
people that it was worth the upgrade.
So, lets change the VERSIONING file/policy. Experimental Modules will
be included in the stable branch. Majority Agree?
-Paul
