On 10/11/2005 04:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Oct 10, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >
[..cut..] > > Not sure what the (original) intent of the XML format was or is, > but I'm assuming that the current implementation is sufficient. > > As it is an undocumented feature right now and the intention is also unclear to me I tend now to leave it as it is. Just tried to make some noise about it to find out if somebody knows more about it, so a change here is not forgotten unintentionally. Regards RĂ¼diger