On 10/11/2005 04:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> On Oct 10, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> 


[..cut..]

> 
> Not sure what the (original) intent of the XML format was or is,
> but I'm assuming that the current implementation is sufficient.
> 
> 

As it is an undocumented feature right now and the intention is also
unclear to me I tend now to leave it as it is. Just tried to make some
noise about it to find out if somebody knows more about it, so a change
here is not forgotten unintentionally.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to