* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-20 16:16:56]: > >I've just commited a small changeset in order to compute the string > >length only once in the function. But yes, we could rely on the > >computed length earlier in the body processing. > > I wonder if fixing the loop would mean that we could remove the >50k > limitation. It should only have to iterate 450,000*2 times which isn't > *that* expensive. =) -- justin
I had the same idea, but I must go to bed now. May you try if you have some spare time ? I'll take a look at it tomorrow if you did not. - Sam -- Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org) -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature