On 10/23/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vadim Chekan wrote: > > > But as soon as this memory is shared, addres cache->nodes for child is > > different from parent. So child overrites parents cache->nodes! > > There are raw pointers in the shm? Well, in a fork() that's expected, but > in attached shared memory, that's an invalid assumption. All 'pointers' > within a shm must be an off_t from the shm base and dereferenced relative > to the client's base address mapping. > > > Bill >
Thans for your reply Bill, Is there a maintainer for this module or should I start working on a patch tha uses offset instead of address in shm? Vadim.
