On 10/23/05, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) 2.1.N is voted on for BETA.
>
> 3) Assuming the vote passes, several days after releasing 2.1.N-BETA, a
> vote to mark 2.1.N-BETA as Stable/General Availability will be called
> for by the 2.1.N Release Manager.
3 days is maybe enough time to catch a couple of build issues that we
didn't see, but not anything else. I don't see the value in making a
big deal about it to the general public if the thing is likely to be
GA before there is time for more than a handful of people to give
feedback. ("Why did I bother with the beta?")
