But it does handle access control which kind of puts in the category of authz vs. anywhere else.
Brad >>> On 11/3/2005 at 9:26:57 am, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there really a rationale for that name change? > > This module is *not* an authz module in the sense of anything from > the used-to-be-auth modules are. > * It lives on a different request processing hook. > * Its semantics, and even HTTP failure code, are different. > * it uses TCP information rather than HTTP information. > * It has a clear but *distinct* relationship with the real authz, > expressed in the Satisfy Any|All directive. > > Reverting the name to mod_access will make it immediately more > accessible to users (a name they know), and reduce the scope > for future confusion. How about it? >
