On 11/20/2005 11:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:


[..cut..]

> 
> If there is consensus that such trivial CHANGES should not be added (which I 
> would
> also tend to with the reasons you mentioned), then I will happily remove the 
> CHANGE
> log entry. So another comment please!

Ok, forget about the removal part. Paul backported it to 2.2.x and taged 2.1.10 
afterwards.
So I cannot remove it for this case. Anyway since I was uncertain about the 
'right' thing
to do here and since it seemed to be handled differently by different people I 
still like
to have further comments on this issue :-).

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to