Ok... so lets say we stop pushing the RC idea for now. What about
clearer marking of "beta" or interim branch releases?
Personally, I think that having an RC vetting process hwere the tarball
is released to the community previous to GA is a worthwhile step and
would help further bring structure to the project.... be that as it may.
I am sure we could all use the respite that bold / emphasized marking
and text about beta / development releases would bring the community.
Wayne S. Frazee
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
In a word, no. We have a release structure and it is working just
fine right now. I don't see any need to fiddle with it by adding
yet another level of version identifiers.
How about "improving" :)
Seriously though, there is a reason for RC being used in lots
of other communities; it is useful information. I don't feel
strongly enough about it to try to "push" it anymore than I've
already done, but if we were to do it, then now would be the
time, and so I brought it up.
