Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 11/23/2005 06:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > It seems to me that is_address_reusable should be > > assumed to be 0 if either > > > > (r->proxyreq == PROXYREQ_PROXY || r->proxyreq == PROXYREQ_REVERSE) > > > > As mentioned, we go ahead and force close the socket > > Does anybody remember why we close the socket in the case of > > r->proxyreq == PROXYREQ_PROXY || r->proxyreq == PROXYREQ_REVERSE > > ? > > >From the first glance it seems to kill many of the connection pooling > >advantages > (especially with the ajp modul) of reusing already established connections. >
Not sure offhand... I need to go thru the archive, but it seems consistent with what we do in ap_proxy_connect_backend() where we close and recreate non-connected sockets :/ Ideally, migrating to the more formal connection pool interface might be nice :) -- ======================================================================= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
