On 12/01/2005 08:15 AM, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >
[..cut..] >> Is buildconf present? If the user runs it, does it corrupt the >> unpacked tree? >> >> If this is so, and it's broken, then perhaps remove buildconf >> throughout the >> tree, and the autoconf source files, resulting in a vanilla ./ >> configure for >> the resulting distribution package? > > > Hm... you kinda need it if you drop in a custom module with its > config5.m4 foo. Or if you want to build with a different libtool than > httpd came with. I agree that's kinda deep though. > BTW: buildconf is also used by the rpm spec file that is delivered with the tar ball. > I wouldn't hold up the release for it. +1 Regards Rüdiger
