On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 11:36:10AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote: > * A Perchild MPM/replacement: The SoC perchild-replacement project > didn't work out. We have a basic design that is sound, but we need to > actually write the code. > +1. Could you dig out a reference to the design? I kind of lost track of where he was going with it. For modules I'd like to see some re-ordering of what we ship in the tarball and what we don't. Another thing I'd like to see is the proxy refactored to use a proper http client lib. As an added benefit, an http client lib would be useful in creating something like CPAN for modules.
vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
