Hi,

* Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-03 14:56:22]:

> > * A Perchild MPM/replacement:  The SoC  perchild-replacement project 
> > didn't work out.  We have a basic design that is sound, but we need to 
> > actually write the code.
> > 
> 
> +1 as a VERY useful thing for 2.2/2.4

I would like to take a look at the mpm-perchild project. Is there a
design document available ? Maybe we should talk about what we
need/want, too.

- Sam

-- 
Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org)
 -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to