The syntax is $(MAKE). Sorry I missed this. And I still see no discussion of removing the module, perhaps you have a pointer to the archives? And what error were you seeing?
All for supporting VisualStudio 2005, but this isn't the end of the headaches. Bill Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
I'm not near my windows box, and the universal inability of any search engine to allow me to search for the literal string "$MAKE" is geting to me. Does anyone know exactly which is correct; "$MAKE" or "($MAKE)" I can reverse engineer the answer tomorrow, but it's still annoying me now. It looks to me, and some others, like the latter would evaluate to "(NMAKE)" and yet when I made the change it got rid of the syntax error, and it looked like a compile with /nologo. Is nmake syntax really that broken? On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:37:06PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win?rev=349713&r1=349712&r2=349713&view=diff ============================================================================== --- httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win (original) +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/Makefile.win Tue Nov 29 04:37:03 2005 @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ !IFNDEF MAKEOPT # Only default the behavior if MAKEOPT= is omitted -!IF "$(MAKE)" == "NMAKE" +!IF "($MAKE)" == "NMAKE" # Microsoft NMake options MAKEOPT=-nologo !ELSEIF "($MAKE)" == "make"
