* Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/8/05, Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > FWIW, I've never seen that syntax before either. > > That's C99 syntax. Older compilers, and C++ compilers, don't > generally support it.
Then we should throw it away. We are supposed to support C89/90. nd
