On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:38:16AM +0100, Maxime Petazzoni wrote: > That's why I only want to call it 0.2 and not 1.0. Because a 0.3 will > come in the next months I hope to fix these problems and improve the > thing. I don't think we should call it 1.0 until we make the dynamic > browser work everywhere. Google makes it for every single > bleeding-edge web-based application they do, why not us ?
I agree that's a suitable roadmap for mod_mbox 1.0. -- justin
