Just this last one, and then that's it until mid-next-week :)
On Dec 29, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
[1] and [3] on their own are simply enough, [2] is the crazy part. Does any of this make any sense?
This all makes a lot of sense to me, in fact #2 kind of aligns with something I was thinking about regarding how to fit per-child into the proxy balancer stuff. In fact, I think that having proxy balancer be the front end to mod_execd allows for a lot of scaling and control, but I haven't gone any further than just thinking about it conceptually (something like defining a worker execd://foo.com/process). Yeah, we'll need something like apr_pass_fd/apr_grab_fd. This reminds me: I know that the GSoC effort for perchild didn't work out, but was *anything* done? I heard something about a design framework being produced?
