On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Before I take any further actions I would like to discuss the desired > behaviour > in the subrequest case: > > 1. Proposal > If a subrequest has a broken backend also set r->no_cache for the main > request and ensure that the chunk filter does not sent the last chunk > marker in this case.
+1. > 2. Proposal > If a subrequest has a broken backend do not sent the error bucket. Only > set r->no_cache to ensure that this subrequest response does not get > cached. I think we still need to ensure that an error bucket is sent too, right? Otherwise, the connection will be reused - what am I missing? -- justin
