André Malo wrote:
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:What is the behavior, is 2.2 now consistent to 1.3? If so I strongly suggest we 'fix' 2.0 to be consistent with both. If it remains 'broken' in 2.2, then let's leave the behavior alone on both 2.0 and 2.2 for one more release cycle.2.2 is consistent with 2.0 (and <= 1.3.10 which was forked to 2.0).
Let's not try to touch in 2.2.1 or 2.0.56 - and start a dialog on what is right and why :)
