On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS wrote:
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jim Jagielski
I think we're in agreement that the current "failover" does
not work as it should with HTTP, and is quite
cumbersome to get it to work. :)
Apart from the fact that it currently does not even work without
patches :-).
Agreed :) Hence the quotes around failover ;)
So I am keen on feedback by Robby. I hope to find time to commit these
changes to the trunk tonight, so that it works at least in the
cumbersome way :-).
++1 !
