Plüm wrote:
  
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jim Jagielski 

On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS wrote:
    


  
So I am keen on feedback by Robby. I hope to find time to 
      
commit these 
    
changes to the trunk tonight, so that it works at least in the
cumbersome way :-).

      

I will cut the breaks from the patch to keep the current syntax alive.
The correct syntax should be defined and discussed later.
And of course documented, once there is a decision on that :-).


Regards

Rüdiger



  
Hi Rudiger,

These list entries have been coming think and fast ; ) A little more info on our setup:

We have two apache 2.2 servers in a heartbeat hot-standby pair, acting as the proxies. Therefore if one of the proxies goes down, HA switches requests to the other. So we're actually using a virtual ip between the 2 proxies. The 2 back end servers run apache 1.3 with Intersystems CACHE and their CSP app server implementation. Requests are basically sent through a cgi sitting in apache to Cache ...

I'm not sure how to incorporate mod_header as you've indicated but will have a chat to the programmers tomorrow and see what we can do. Our requirement from mod_proxy/mod_proxy_balancer is basically to have one proxy receiving all requests and if it goes down, then switch to the next proxy, etc.

As per my previous post, I can start apache now with the one worker disabled. However, the failover is not occurring. I understand this is very bleeding edge so ... thanks for all the help so far.

Regards

Robby

Reply via email to