I know you said no discussion Grisha, but can I have 2 ballots? ;)
-1 If Graham thinks his conn handler fix is good, let's do 3.2.7 today.
+1 If Graham is not sure, we release 3.2.6 now as is, and do a 3.2.7
bugfix in the next 4 to 6 weeks after digging into _conn_read issue further.
So, I guess that makes my official vote a +0.
Over to you Graham. No pressure though. :)
Jim
(Dang, it makes me feel dirty to waffle on my first offical vote that way).
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
OK, I know we've had some votes on this before, but I'd like to put this
in a separate thread where it's not intermixed with all kinds of other
things.
This is a vote for the core group. We can release the 3.2.6 tarball as
is or fix the connection handler bugs (there are two of them - the
buffer pointer and eagain condition Graham tracked down) and release a
3.2.7 (or 3.2.6.1). The rationale for disregarding those known issues is
that the connection handler is hardly used by anyone. The rationale for
NOT disregarding is that we claim this to be a stable release, and given
our slow release cycle, I imagine 3.2.6 will be around for a while.
Anyhow - *the core group* (you know who you are), if you think 3.2.6
should be released as is, send in your +1.
Let's keep this thread strictly a vote, without it turning into a
discussion (we can discuss things in other threads).
My official vote is +0.
(To see what this means read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html)
Grisha
