Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Hmmm... Possibly SSL requires close_on_recycle. Or, at > least, using that flag as required for SSL. >
I don't have time to explain in more detail, but the more I look over the old way, it was to maintain some sort of local state-of-health on the socket pre-and-post each request... As such, I'm *thinking* that the code patch should be reverted to maintain that logic, and extend it, rather than remove it... -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
