On Monday 06 March 2006 21:48, Bojan Smojver wrote: > I'm trying to figure out how mod_dbd works and from what I can see, it > enables: > > - connection pool configured inside VH (and above) only > - one connection string (i.e. DBDParams) per VH > > If the above is correct, wouldn't it be better if it allowed "named" > connections, so that module writers can keep simultaneous connections > (i.e. identified by some kind of alias or even connection string) > opened to many databases?
That has indeed been discussed, and might happen sometime. Though of course too many different connections are going to mean quite a load on the server! > It would also be handy if connections could be configured per > directory/location. It would enable module writers to have a notion of > different "applications" for different URIs inside the virtual host, > with completely different set of database connections they can use. No. That would be appropriate to applications, not to mod_dbd itself. Persistent resources have to be tied to the server_rec. -- Nick Kew
