Trent Nelson wrote:
When the Win32 source package was generated for 2.0.55, what versions of srclib/apr, apr-util and apr-iconv were used? Is it safe to assume that httpd releases, such as 2.0.55, are built against tagged apr* versions, rather than trunk?
It wasn't safe to assume that until recently. Only in the last handful of releases has the httpd project 'seperated' itself from the spinoff apr project, and entrusted them to release an official apr version used by httpd. In this case, it was 0.9.7. If you ever doubt, look at include/apr_revision.h Bill
