[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: pquerna > Date: Fri Mar 31 22:33:47 2006 > New Revision: 390599 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390599&view=rev > Log: > I am not comfortable with this solution for making the flushing band aid > configurable. I do not oppose the concept, just the placement of the > configuration information inside of the mod_proxy core, and not in > mod_proxy_ajp. >
The main reason why it's in mod_proxy (and the various elements renamed from ajp_foo to foo) is that as we extend mod_proxy for other protocols, same packet-based like AJP, this will likely be a common problem. Even in non-packet based protocols, I can see wanting some level of admin control. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
