On 03/31/2006 06:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Some concerns about the else path: > > a) is 500 proper? should it just return OK instead? I think 500 is good. > > b) what about logging that path to ensure that the administrator has > some help diagnosing the problem, since we can't carry the > apr_status_t any further than here? > > There are concerns of too much logging (filter has already logged > something) or too little logging (filter didn't log anything). The > access log won't have any strong hints that something bad happened > since r->status didn't get changed and c->aborted didn't get set. What about the debug level for this log message? Would this be a compromise between too much logging and no logging? Regards Rüdiger
