On 04/02/2006 02:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >>Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237&view=rev has not >>been >>backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(. >>So I am now -1. >>Should I propose r379237 for backport? > > > ++1 ! :)
Proposed for backport as r390812. Sorry for not noticing earlier that this patch was missing :-(. Regards Rüdiger
