Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > > Since there's little sense in not including the Expect header fix, I'll > roll 2.0.57 in 24 hours with that fix in, and potentially a mod_deflate > fix too. >
+1 > Also, what are people's thoughts on including sha1 signatures in our > official dist? We havn't heretofore, is there any benefit? The PGP > signatures are there to confirm veracity, the simple checksums are > really only to detect corrupted downloads, but some users do make the > md5 = insecure equation very readily. > +0 I'm not sure why people make that equation :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
