On 4/21/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know of any reason to hurry a 2.0.x release (heck, I don't > know of any reason to continue its development), but I also don't think > releasing one with modified copyright years is any more or less legal > than continuing to distribute the previous releases. Nor do I think > any of our users will ever care enough to challenge the notices.
+1
